TR-018WARNINGCriticality BTruck AI-flagged
Manufacturer
Mandala Motors
Model
MX-130 HD
Location
Estate E
Commissioned
2023-01-15
Age
3 years
Operating hours
16,374 h
Utilization
78%
Availability (90 d)
95.9%
MTBF / MTTR
1,142 h / 4.3 h
Replacement cost
Rp 912.0 m
Sensors
temperature, oilCondition, rpm
Region
Sumatra
Health score
Predictive maintenance
Asset Failure Prediction v3.2 · gradient-boosted survival model on IoT, SCADA and CMMS history · refreshed 06:52
Confidence80%
Health score
72/100
Failure probability
34%7 days
Remaining useful life
29days
Anomaly score
0.720–1
Likely cause
Fuel consumption +24% vs comparable trips — injector or idling
Recommendation
Telematics review + injector inspection
What the model sees
Confidence80%Fuel consumption +24% vs comparable trips — injector or idling. Failure probability 34% over 7 days and RUL ≈ 29 days. Telematics review + injector inspection.
Why this prediction — top drivers (pp of failure probability)
Baseline failure rate for class ≈ 12% · bars push probability up or down
Temperature deviation
+13 pp
Oil condition index
+7.8 pp
Speed deviation
+5.1 pp
Age / operating hours
+0.8 pp
Recent preventive maintenance
−2.0 pp
◀ lowers predictionraises ▶
Sensor trends & failure forecast
60-day history (daily) · dashed = model forecast · anomaly began 14 Sep
Temperature · °C
Warning 78 · Alarm 88 °C
Maintenance Decision Intelligence
Weighs failure probability, criticality, downtime impact, repair vs replacement cost, spare availability and production schedule
Decision inputs
Failure probability (7 d)34%
CriticalityClass B
Downtime impactRp 6 m / h
Planned repair costRp 27 m
Replacement costRp 912.0 m
Spare availabilityTYR-TR-900: in local store
Production scheduleFlexible (estate fleet)
Option suitability
Schedule maintenance82
Fits next planned shutdown; balances risk and production
Monitor58
Risk too high to run without intervention
Replace component24
No single failing component identified
Repair now16
Low downtime cost, but unplanned mobilisation
Replace asset8
Health 72/100 and age 3 yrs do not justify capex
Scenario comparison
OPTION A
Repair immediately
Stop line now, replace component using emergency transfer
Failure risk2%
Expected costRp 61 m
Planned downtime4 h
Lowest risk, but takes the unit out of evacuation/field work immediately.
Recommended
OPTION B
Repair in low-production window
Replace at next planned shutdown
Failure risk12%
Expected costRp 30 m
Planned downtime4 h
Recommended — balances failure risk against production loss at the next planned shutdown.
OPTION C
Continue monitoring
Run to next scheduled shutdown (14 days)
Failure risk34%
Expected costRp 53 m
Planned downtime0 h
Expected cost dominated by probability-weighted unplanned outage.
Recommendation: Schedule maintenance
Confidence80%Telematics review + injector inspection. Option B expected cost Rp 30 m vs Rp 53 m if left to run; residual risk 12%.
Spare parts availability
Key parts for TR-018 across the warehouse network · home store WH-03
Cross-module: Inventory AI
TYR-TR-900 · Truck tyre 9.00-20
Lead time 10 d · Rp 3.6 m/pcs · 30-d demand 17
WH-03 · Estate B (home)
11 pcs · SS 3
WH-04 · Estate C
12 pcs · SS 3
FLT-TR-FUEL · Truck fuel filter
Lead time 7 d · Rp 240 k/pcs · 30-d demand 34
WH-03 · Estate B (home)
28 pcs · SS 4
WH-04 · Estate C
19 pcs · SS 4
BRK-TR-PAD · Truck brake lining set
Lead time 10 d · Rp 1.1 m/set · 30-d demand 9
WH-03 · Estate B (home)
6 set · SS 2
WH-04 · Estate C
11 set · SS 2
Maintenance records
CMMS history, open work orders, failure events and spares
| Work order | Type | Description | Created | Due | Technician | Cost | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO-4403 | Predictive | AI-flagged: Fuel consumption +24% vs comparable trips | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-30 | Unassigned | — | Open |